In my last article, Working Backwards: Why It's So Important in Product Design, I discussed the significance of starting with the end in mind to achieve a crystal-clear objective for product development. This approach ensures that we remain laser-focused on our goals, but what comes next is equally crucial in the product design journey. Today, I want to delve into the subsequent phase: testing your idea and the innovative "Teacher-Customer" alpha process we employ at myKaarma.
A common trap for product designers is falling in love with their own ideas, a phenomenon often referred to as "drinking your own Kool-Aid." At myKaarma, we challenge this notion head-on with a somewhat cryptic mantra: "your last idea is your worst idea... try and kill it." This statement underscores the importance of overcoming confirmation bias, which can lead designers to believe their ideas are good simply because they conceived them.
To navigate this, we advocate for a process where you metaphorically "fire yourself and re-hire yourself" as a new product manager. This fresh perspective forces you to scrutinize your idea critically, searching for flaws and attempting to "kill" the idea. If the idea survives this rigorous examination, it's allowed to progress to the next stage
Once an idea has passed the initial scrutiny, the next challenge is testing it in the market. At myKaarma, we've developed a unique approach known as the "Teacher-Customer" (TC) alpha process. This method involves selecting 3-5 customers who exhibit early adopter characteristics to participate in a structured feedback loop. The TC framework is meticulously outlined to ensure clarity and commitment from both parties. Here's a glimpse into the framework:
1. Product/Feature Overview: Clearly defining what we're testing.
2. Benefits: Outlining the advantages for the dealer.
3. Dealer Commitment: Specifying what's expected from the dealer during the process.
4. myKaarma's Commitment: Detailing our obligations to the dealer.
5. Scope Limitations: Clarifying what will not be covered.
6. End of Process: Establishing when the TC process concludes.
7. Pricing: Agreeing on pricing up-front.
This comprehensive outline is not just for formality's sake. It serves a dual purpose: ensuring dealers understand their role as both teachers and customers, and setting clear expectations for the engagement. Critical to this process is the commitment from dealers to provide consistent feedback, participate in weekly meetings, and allow on-site observations (Genchi-Genbutsu). By clearly defining the scope, commitments, and end date, we create a structured environment conducive to learning, iterating, and ultimately achieving a product that meets the initial set of dealers' needs.
The TC process is designed to be mutually beneficial. Dealers who participate gain early access to innovative solutions at exclusive early-adopter pricing. For myKaarma, this process allows us to pivot and refine our product based on real-world feedback, ensuring that when a product is launched, it truly meets the market's needs.
This approach has been honed over 20+ years and has become a cornerstone of our product development philosophy at myKaarma. If you're intrigued by the "Teacher-Customer" alpha process and are considering implementing a similar strategy in your organization (and you're not a direct competitor), I'm more than happy to share insights and answer questions through LinkedIn.
In conclusion, transitioning from idea validation to market testing is a critical phase in product design. By embracing a structured, feedback-driven approach, we can ensure that our products not only survive the scrutiny of their creators but also thrive in the hands of early adopters, paving the way for successful market launches.
This article was originally published on Linkedin. Connect with and follow Ujj for more insights.